Maslow's Peak: Reports From the Left
  • home
  • blog
  • grant consulting services
  • about
  • contact

How about a little bit of both - on teaching folks to fish.

5/13/2012

9 Comments

 
Picture
Let's be fair and assume that conservatives and liberals agree on this; we should feed the hungry.  And that we all look forward to a time when fewer will face hunger.  The axiom "give a man a fish, he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish, he will eat for a lifetime" resonates with people from all political persuasions.  The majority of us even agree that the government has some role in providing that initial fish, if you will, so while we do argue about the scope of programs like food stamps, Medicaid, and Social Security, you don’t hear many calling to shut them down completely.

Most of us would also concur that in the long run, we’d rather teach someone to fish, allowing as many folks as possible to participate actively in our social and economic systems. 

You wouldn’t know it by listening to the zealots of any ilk, but most of us, across parties and ideologies, want the same things.  For example, you don’t find mainstream Republicans rejecting interstate roads, safety standards for pharmaceuticals, or a federal court system.  You won’t find most Democrats claiming they don’t enjoy material comforts, appreciate the entrepreneurial spirit, or want young people to aspire to their highest goals, whether that means becoming an artist or a wealthy CEO. 

Most of us, left or right, are neither radical socialists, or robber barons.  

It's when we we turn to the question of how to lift millions of poor-but-able adults out of poverty, our viewpoints do start to diverge.  What should we expect of the individual, despite their circumstances and external barriers to success?  What role should government play?  We know that escaping really tough beginnings is statistically unusual.  And I would hope most people know that many, many people in living in poverty labor hard to improve their lot - research bears that out as well.

Again extending the benefit of the doubt, I truly believe that most of us, left or right, want as many folks as possible to be happy, healthy, and productive.  There is plenty of altruism among every political sector, and there is also a healthy self-interest in seeing the country thrive.  So how do we get there?

The conservative “bootstraps” ideal clashes with the liberal “intervention” ideal, and, stoked by opportunistic punditry and entrenched suspicion, animus has flourished.  It’s a complex area, and stereotypes have evolved to the point of of mythology.  We default to lashing out, with “why can’t these people just get a job??” versus “why do you people hate the poor??”  We fall prey to cynical voices, shrieking that heartless conservatives want to eat caviar while hungry babies cry, or that smarmy liberals want feckless thugs to revel in lives of state-sponsored ease.  

In reality, it is possible for well-meaning people (to paraphrase the old saying) to differ on how to best teach someone to fish.

Some of the misunderstanding may come from of a lack of awareness about the differences between the kind of “situational poverty” that has come out of the recession, as opposed to the more prevalent “generational poverty” that has existed in the US for well over a century.  The most promising remedies to these two very different problems are not the same.  Add that to the fact that poverty is an emotional issue, and that our vocabulary about it has been ravaged by cable news and talk radio, and you have ordinary people with opposing viewpoints seeing each other as immoral lunatics.  

If we could tone down the demagoguery, we could learn to apply the best aspects of both approaches:
  • An authentic emphasis on job-creation and recovery could be applied to help those devastated by the economic collapse. 
  • Robust federal investment into ravaged communities could ease suffering from chronic poverty, and provide a way out.

While Republicans have been forced by a few into espousing radical theories, support for their classic ideas is widely distributed across ideologies.
Eliminating pointless and outmoded regulations allows businesses to use increased revenue to hire more people.
Tax breaks for small business encourage new ventures and expansion of existing operations. 
Federally-funded social programs should be accountable and transparent, and evaluated for effectiveness. 
Without the right formatting, ample assistance programs run the risk of encouraging dependency.

Democrats have been pushed to fight tooth and nail to protect basic entitlements, so their demands may have come to sound strident and one-dimensional.  But the desire is not to simply truck in endless supplies of free goods and services to poor communities, achieving nothing but stasis.
The desire is to provide training, skills-building, support services, encouragement, and access to opportunity, to people who aren’t getting it elsewhere. 
The idea is that people naturally want to better and support themselves. 
That social programs are an investment. 
That by funding the teaching of literacy, job skills, effective parenting, family-budgeting and health management, the country will profit from a stronger and more productive citizenry.  

In any case, we’ll need to re-learn how to work together as soon as possible, because the country can only afford so much fish.

9 Comments
JH (The Lofty Left)
5/21/2012 05:46:41 am

I agree with your post in the main. However, I think that the problem today is that too many on the right have abandoned the notion that ideas from the left have merit. Compromise can only come, I think, when two sides have mutual respect for their respective positions. We don't have that, for the most part, at this point in time. And with that reality, I am not sure how we can move forward. Meanwhile, people still need those fish.

Reply
Julie link
5/21/2012 09:44:24 am

Thanks for the comments, JH. I actually couldn't agree more. Writing this was an exercise in balance for me. A way of pushing myself to lay out the two viewpoints without accusations. But as philosophies are playing themselves out in the country right now, it's hard to find examples of the more classic conservative ideals. Instead we see a radical viewpoint that considers it acceptable to do things like cut food stamps. Food stamp allotments right now come to roughly $30.00 per week per person. How do you even discuss reducing that?

Reply
Julie link
7/17/2012 03:21:18 am

I'm having to laugh at myself a bit coming back to my comment after some time away. I wrote this whole post in one spirit, and then proved unable to stay in that spirit as soon as I published the post. Hey, I'm only human, lol. I didn't say I had achieved the ideal yet.

I remember when writing this I was in a terrible funk because the argument at the time wasn't about whether or how much to INVEST in the poorest communities in our country, it was instead skewed completely to towards how much Republicans in Congress could get away with CUTTING domestic spending. I was personally involved in a literacy program that would be drastically defunded by cuts.

And as I write this now, that same debate about food stamps is going on, and the idea of cutting that particular program horrifies me.

It's hard to stay in that solution-oriented place. But to do so I'm still convinced both sides will have to take some responsibility.

Reply
spanish with skype link
7/29/2012 07:16:13 pm

All the contents you mentioned in post is too good and can be very useful. I will keep it in mind, thanks for sharing the information keep updating, looking forward for more posts. Thanks

Reply
Julie link
9/27/2012 01:52:19 pm

thanks!

Reply
Lms software link
10/4/2012 09:35:42 pm

I am so grateful to find your particular post. It is really very nice post.

Reply
Atlantic Canada speaker link
5/16/2013 10:47:42 pm

I am enjoying studying your content. It got my interest and I could study it over over again. I really like this content. Thank you.

Reply
Julie Boler link
5/16/2013 11:47:27 pm

Hi folks - just wanted to say thanks so much to those who have apparently stumbled across this site. I love hearing from you - your comments are so helpful!

Reply
cassandra07 link
10/18/2013 06:09:18 am

First time here at your blog and wanted to say hi.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Politics & Policy
    all posts by Julie Boler

    Categories

    All
    2012 Election
    2016 Election
    2025 Current Crisis
    Better Angels Journal
    Capitalism
    Church/state
    Conservatism
    Crime & Justice
    Democracy
    Election Law
    Gun Regulation
    Lgbt Policy
    Liberal Theory
    Media
    Obama
    Poverty
    Race
    Reproductive Law
    Voting Rights
    World Affairs

    Archives

    April 2025
    February 2019
    January 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    October 2014
    May 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo from nathanrussell