Maslow's Peak: Reports From the Left
  • home
  • blog
  • about/contact

Some of Them Are Sweet As We Are.

8/29/2016

1 Comment

 
by Julie Boler
PictureUs and Them - Richard Willson
Last week, on the one-year anniversary of Donald Trump's escalator-enhanced announcement of his candidacy, a video from that night made the rounds. It shows Trump, in an interview with Bill O'Reilly (see min. 1:55), asserting that babies born to illegal immigrants (also known, in the bigotry community, as "anchor babies") are not US citizens, 14th-Amendment dictates on birthright citizenship be damned. Trump promises to deport all illegal immigrants, but concedes that he’d work to expedite the re-entry to the US of certain deportees. Which deportees? "... the good ones. And there are plenty of good ones."

Growing up in Evansville, Indiana, in the 1970's, my grade-school-rebel self objected when my white classmates used the n-word. They appeared to have a tacit agreement that while one shouldn't call anyone that, or say it around strangers, when talking about black people among young white peers, its use was unremarkable. I disagreed. Whenever I heard it, I complained that it was a mean, bad word, and that it was wrong to say it. (Well, and I'd yell, "Stop saying that!" - one reason I always heard "You're so bossy!" at such an early age.)

Countless times then, one of my little friends would adopt a patronizing tone and explain how they’d been taught by a father or aunt or older sibling that the word didn't apply to all black people. "It just means the bad ones. There are good ones," they'd expound, "and bad ones." Trying to reassure their troubled playmate, they'd say, "Don't worry, Julie, (n-word) is only for the bad ones."

I don't remember the extent of my vocabulary at the time, but I do remember thinking, if not in so many words, that beyond using slurs, it was dehumanizing to say "good ones and bad ones" when talking about people.

PictureMississippi schoolgirls at naptime.
My siblings will recognize the title of this post as a quote we have cherished for decades, for its comedic value. It was the earnest declaration of a preteen neighbor who lived in the North Carolina apartment complex we’d moved to in the early 80's. This young lady was not an especially clever thinker, but her heart was in the right place. Her breathless, drawling that "Some of them are sweet as we are!" was inspired by some especially positive experience with a black person, the details of which I have since forgotten.

That this was a revelation to her was very interesting to us, and because her personality was so guileless and, well, 
sweet, it had its charm. And sure, it was good she’d figured out such a thing. But the enjoyment of the memory dulls a little when considering what her exclamation laid bare. It betrayed her presumable view that some of them are not as sweet as we are. (Okay, I still get a giggle out of that.) And it raised the question of whether, heretofore​, she'd imagined that… er… none of them are sweet as we are. The "we" and "them", even when used by the kind-hearted, always rankles.

During his announcement, Trump famously said, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with (sic) us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

As outrageous as that statement was, I was more bothered by the next one. It gave me again the feeling I'd had as a schoolgirl: the good old, surely-you-don't-mean-people-here feeling. In the statement, and I've reread the transcript to confirm my memory, Trump uses "it" to refer to "the bad ones". "They're sending us not the right people. It's coming from more than Mexico. It's coming from all over South and Latin America (sic), and it's coming probably -- probably -- from the Middle East."
Picture
One might point to such language when engaged in a dialogue about current levels of racism in the US, which often focus on overt events like Klan rallies or acts of violence by white nationalists. It's like the practice by some manufacturers of bras and pantyhose of calling their beige shade selection "nude"; or the fact that descriptors of race aren’t used in news stories except to differentiate people of color; or the observation, "You don't sound/act black." Such pervasive dismissals illuminate a constant undertone of undying racism.

Meanwhile, on he goes: Trump continues to use the "good ones" and "bad ones" terminology in his campaign. And it continues to hit my ear like the utterance of a sheltered, Southern thirteen-year old, or of a pretend-grownup fourth grader, on a playground in the 70's Midwest. ​
1 Comment

    Politics & Policy
    all posts by Julie Boler

    Categories

    All
    2012 Election
    2016 Election
    Better Angels Journal
    Capitalism
    Church/state
    Conservatism
    Crime & Justice
    Democracy
    Election Law
    Gun Regulation
    Lgbt Policy
    Liberal Theory
    Media
    Obama
    Poverty
    Race
    Reproductive Law
    Voting Rights
    World Affairs

    Archives

    February 2019
    January 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    October 2014
    May 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from nathanrussell