Maslow's Peak: Reports From the Left
  • home
  • blog
  • about/contact

2012 State of the Union

1/25/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Left, Barack Obama delivers 2012 State of the Union address to Congress. Flanked by Vice-President Joe Biden on top left and Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH), top right. Above, First Lady Michelle Obama surrounded by guests.
_Top notch State of the Union address.  I have a feeling it will go down as the most unapologetically liberal in decades.  It outlined what liberals REALLY want, contrary to the simplistic stereotypes.  Most of us, and obviously our President, want this:

1. A strong defense that focuses on intelligence, targeted strikes, and reduction of ground troop levels.  A vigorous reliance on diplomacy, sanctions, and support for grassroots democracies.

2. Reform of regulations so that we keep important controls and accountability in place, but get rid of useless and silly ones.  (eg, spilled milk)

3. Principled capitalism.  By now conservatives should know/admit that we aren't looking for economic socialism.  There are millions of successful liberal business people, investors, entrepreneurs, wealthy folks, and just middle class Americans who love living in an upwardly mobile country with a marketplace.  We just want an ethical marketplace; fair trade, regulated banking and lending, investors that have to take on legitimate risks or pay the consequences out of their profits, freedom for workers to organize, and companies that recognize the value of providing high wages and good benefits.  And of course, an equitable tax code.

By definition, capitalism drives people or commercial entities to maximize profits at every turn.  This drive is a good thing - it leads to innovation, industry, and success.  There are two ways to ensure that this drive doesn't create an environment in which bad business practices flourish - practices like deceit and obfuscation, cutting corners with safety and quality, or hiding assets and illegally protecting against risk.  One way to counteract that is for the entrepreneur or business to operate in an ethical way, and be creative about how to both make money and exemplify American values.  This business model is used all over the country by many, many successful companies, which have proven it can be done.  Conservatives should join progressives who promote these businesses, as they are our best hope for reducing government oversight and intervention, which, surprise surprise, even liberals would be happy to see.  But in the absence of this kind of self-control, we have to use the second tool: government oversight.  Some businesses will always put profit above any principle, and their excesses and pillaging damage the economy and ruin lives. 

4. A commitment to robust government support and intervention in challenged areas, like education, infrastructure, science, health care, and clean energy.  Conservatives refuse to see the long-term value of investing generously to achieve excellence in these areas.

5. Job creation.  The government can play a crucial role in this area, especially in tough times.  The so-called private job creators are sitting on their money right now, and justifying that with the circular logic that when the economy improves, they will start investing in the economy again.  Meanwhile, a country with our resources is lucky enough to be in a position to use tax dollars to put people to work.  It's absurd not to do that when it would improve our situation so quickly, thus providing away for private enterprise to take back over.  Another area in which, surprise surprise, liberals would LOVE to see the need for government intervention to disappear.

6. A strong safety net.  Conservatives confuse the commitment to a sturdy system of life-support for the poor with an economic policy.  We don't want government benefits instead of more jobs!  What an interesting argument the country is having about this right now.  We are seen as wanting to coddle the poor and instill dependency.  Of course not, that isn't a goal, it is a provision of sustenance.  This food stamp discussion...  If it were up to me, we would expand the food stamp program.  Everyone is not fed right now
.  Charities, churches, food banks, Meals on Wheels, etc., are trying their best to supplement food stamps, but they cannot be expected to solve a problem on this scale.  There is no excuse for a country this wealthy to let people go hungry - it is shameful.  It isn't a solution - no one is saying that.  We must simultaneously work on improving the economy.  Whether you agree or disagree with any current President's approach to economic recovery, you don't just leave hungry people in the lurch?  Many, MANY kids eat their best two meals of the day at school.  When you work with troubled kids from poor families in schools, you know that one thing that keeps them coming to school everyday, for better or worse, is that they get to eat two hot meals that day.  You shudder knowing that on weekends, holidays, and summer vacation, they aren't getting as much.  Painting any President's support of a substantial food stamp program, pretending it is a substitute, in his mind, for economic recovery, is a false narrative designed to elicit a cheap, uninformed, emotional response.

It's interesting to hear the reactions to the State of the Union speech today.  You have to translate sometimes - let me offer a cheat sheet.  Republicans can't say they liked an idea put forth by Obama.  To ferret out their approval, note when they say:
  • He says that, but he doesn't mean it.  It's all just pretty talk.
  • He should have said that a long time ago.
  • He's only saying that to get reelected.
0 Comments

Melissa Harris-Perry

1/15/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
Melissa V. Harris-Perry is professor of political science at Tulane University.  She is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South.  She is an increasingly visible and effective media personality. Harris-Perry churned quickly through her first 15 minutes of national fame and kept on charging.  After logging several years as a popular professor and an outspoken social critic on the lecture circuit, her star really began rising as an occasional guest on MSNBC's evening news commentary programs.  She quickly established an authoritative voice in the national dialogue on important cultural and political issues.  Harris-Perry now hosts her own program on MSNBC each weekend, and her contribution is truly a boon to the country.  Her show appears on Saturdays and Sundays, 10:00am-12:00pm. 

Harris-Perry is great on television, able to think on her feet during those rapid-fire, expert-in-a-box debates, and has come into her on with her own show.  She is disarmingly effective, at once confrontational and charming.  But it's in her writing that you see the depth of her insight.  What I love most about her body of work is her unwavering assertion that society has a responsibility to address racism and sexism. 

The crux of her work has been an investigation of the confluence of race, gender and politics, and especially the stubborn inequalities that exist in the US.  As I have said elsewhere on this site, these issues are not the quaint, sixties-era counterculture obsessions that conservatives and even centrist Democrats would like to make them.  If nothing else, we should view the work of people like Harris-Perry with self-interest.  We won't ever begin to realize our potential as a country until we lay these problems bare and solve them. Harris-Perry's commentary on current events, which you can read on her website, melissaharrisperry.com, is lively and smart.  She has a biting sense of humor and writes with entertaining prose, while her theories are carefully considered and defended.  It is a treat to find a writer who can be entertaining and colorful while operating inside a sound, academic format.  Harris-Perry definitely pulls that off.

In a recent article on her website, melissaharrisperry.com, Harris-Perry spoke about Presidential politics, the rhetoric around Herman Cain's campaign, and the potentiality of having two black candidates run against each other for the White House. 
"[W]e need to bury, once and for all, the idea that racism is primarily about saying mean or unflattering things about black people, and specifically saying mean or unflattering things about President Obama. We need to insist that discussions of American racism rest firmly in revealing and addressing the disparate impact of policies and practices that create or deepen racially unequal outcomes. Racial animus might have prompted the nasty signage about the president at anti–healthcare reform rallies, but who cares? The issues of racism in healthcare are the continuing racial health disparities that impact black Americans from infancy to old-age. When some whites refuse to vote for Barack Obama it might be caused by racism, but the voting racism I am much more interested in is the voting and registration regulations that state governments are imposing right now in ways that will likely disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of black voters.  If we allow white Democrats to believe that support for Barack Obama is sufficient to protect them from any racialized criticism then we will have to extend that same logic to Republican supporters of Cain. Both are ridiculous. The politically relevant question on race is not the willingness to support a candidate who shows up in a black body. Anti-racism is not about hugging the black guy running for president, it’s about embracing policies that reduce structural unfairness and eliminate continuing racial inequality."

Melissa Harris-Perry
www.melissaharrisperry.com



Books by Melissa Harris-Perry

Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes,
and Black Women in America
2011, Yale University Press

Barbershops, Bibles, and BET:
Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought
2005, Princeton University Press
Picture
0 Comments

    Politics & Policy
    all posts by Julie Boler

    Categories

    All
    2012 Election
    2016 Election
    Better Angels Journal
    Capitalism
    Church/state
    Conservatism
    Crime & Justice
    Democracy
    Election Law
    Gun Regulation
    Lgbt Policy
    Liberal Theory
    Media
    Obama
    Poverty
    Race
    Reproductive Law
    Voting Rights
    World Affairs

    Archives

    February 2019
    January 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    October 2014
    May 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from nathanrussell